Write your awesome label here.
Green AI

Put green engineering guidance inside the agentic coding tools your teams already use.

Ten modules on building green agent skills: where they belong across the engineering lifecycle, how to design and build one to the standard, designing the agent itself for a low footprint, distributing a single source across tools, governing them, and evaluating whether they change what the tools produce.
7h 40m
of learning
10
modules
30 questions
final assessment
80%
to pass
Certification
upon completion

Building a Green AI Agent

What
How
Tools
Who

How the course works

Built to the agent skills standard

Skills built to a standard and governed as such, rather than a prompt library.

Review as the high-leverage point

One integration there influences every change that passes through it, which makes it a strong first choice for many teams.

Worked examples and a capstone

Build and install, evaluate and measure, then design and evaluate your own.

What this course helps with

Guidance at the moment of decision

Green engineering guidance that arrives while the code is being written is followed more often than a standard that sits in a wiki.

One maintained source

Editor, review tool and pipeline carrying the same version, rather than drifting copies.

Evidence that a skill works

A way to check whether the code the tools produce is measurably less wasteful, rather than assuming the skill is effective.

Who this is for

  • Architects and developers using agentic tools day to day

  • Platform and developer-experience engineers who distribute tooling

  • Engineering leads standardizing practice across teams

Related courses:

For model training decisions rather than the coding loop, see Green AI for ML Practitioners.

What you will work with

The lifecycle map

Where a skill earns its place across seven points, from design and architecture through testing, review and delivery to the operations handoff.

One source, many tools

Distributing the same guidance without forking it into divergent copies.

The evaluation

How to establish whether the skill changed the output.

What you will be able to do

  • Choose where a need is cheapest to serve: system prompt, tools, retrieval, skill or fine-tuning
  • Decide where in the engineering lifecycle a skill earns its place
  • Design and build a sustainability skill to the standard, with its claims kept checkable
  • Distribute one maintained source across several tools
  • Govern skills as an organizational standard with owners and versions
  • Evaluate whether a skill actually changes what the tools produce, using a quality bar set in advance

Course Lessons

The full course

Every module ends with an application exercise and a worked solution.

01

The Prompt Footprint

Introduces the five-dimensional view: cost, carbon, energy, water, embodied hardware. Establishes SCI for AI as the standards anchor. Positions the regulatory landscape (CSRD, EU AI Act, procurement disclosure) as the why now for Footprint literacy.
Before You Begin
Modules

02

The Specification Lever

How prompt intent quality drives Footprint. The GSF Intent Framework introduced. Trade-offs: over-specification wastes tokens, under-specification wastes retries. Worked examples across capability tiers.
Modules

03

The Structure Lever

Prompt organization: system messages, few-shot examples, output constraints, formatting instructions. Where structure earns its tokens and where it doesn't.
Modules

04

The Reasoning Depth Lever

When to invoke chain-of-thought, tree-of-thought, extended reasoning modes; when not to. The GSF Reasoning Budget: task-class taxonomy for reasoning depth decisions.
Modules

05

The Model Selection Lever

The most consequential single decision in inference efficiency. Capability tiers and routing decisions. The GSF Model Fit Test protocol. Same task across tiers, measured.
Halfway Check-in
Modules

06

The Orchestration Lever

Where agents leak resource: tool selection, chain depth, redundant retrieval, missing caching. Token budgets as a first-class design constraint. Case study from the supply-chain agent paper (70–90% workflow-level savings).
Modules

07

Measuring the Prompt Footprint

Hands-on demonstrations with EcoLogits, CodeCarbon, AI Energy Score. Producing numbers a CSRD auditor can read. The measurement chain from token count to gCO₂eq.
Modules

08

Procurement & Disclosure

What to ask your LLM vendor. What CSRD and the EU AI Act will require. The GSF Procurement question bank organized by Footprint dimension.
Modules

09

Course Completion

50 questions, 120 minutes. Pass Marks: 85%
Final Assessment
Share Your Feedback

Assessment & Certification

How you are assessed

  • A short knowledge check after every module, drawn at random from that module’s pool
  • A final assessment of 30 scenario-judgement questions from a pool of 150+
  • 80% to pass, 60 minutes, retake available
  • Questions test judgement in situations you will meet — not recall of figures that date

What you earn

GSF Certification
Green AI Executive
  • Issued on passing the final assessment
  • Valid for 2 years, refreshed by a short update module
  • Shareable credential for your profile, CV and tender responses

Time to complete

Reading and exercises
7h 40m across 14 modules
Knowledge checks
About 5 minutes per module
Final assessment
60 minutes
Typical completion
2–3 weeks at a module per session, entirely self-paced

Join the Pilot

The GSF Academy is currently in pilot. If your organization would like to enrol learners and issue GSF certifications to your teams, tell us what you need, and we'll follow up to discuss access, pricing, and enrolment.

Request Access for Your Organization

Question required

 Your name

Question required

 Work Email

Question required

 Tell us about your organisation

Which courses are most relevant to you?